2  WHERE IS THE MIND? 1)

"Not only will men of science have to grapple with science that deal with man - but, and this is a far more difficult matter - they will have to persuade the world to listen to what they have discovered. If they can not succeed in these difficult enterprise, man will destroy himself by his halfway cleverness. I am told that, if he were out of the way, the future would lie with rats. I hope they will find it a pleasent world, but I am glad I shall no be there." ¹⁾

Rehearsing Chapter I, as a refreshing memory; "How is the Universe constructed ?" After we look around at all the time more or less, since Aristotle 2500 years ago, all of the great SCIENTIST, chronologically, all over the world .. Ptolemeus, Kepler, ... Einstein, Bohr, Schr dinger, Carl Sagan, John Wheeler, Paul Davis, Weinberg ... Baiqunni, Karlina .... they all can not explaining it , except Hawking, but he was confused, as he explicitly states, " ..... these answers may seem as obvious to us as the earth orbiting the sun _ or perhaps as ridiculous as a tower of tortoises." ²⁾ The universe has a beginning proved by Penzias & Wilson's measurement of the facts of the echo or big bang radiation,in 1964, and now in 1992 by Cobe I. And No Boundary Proposal means - beginless begin and endless end of the universe verified by Cobe II. Paradox, means, these are ridiculous results!

But these of the facts of the real world and the imaginary world are true, really exist at its time ! (really Absolute Right, due to referring to the Vacuum which is absolute, which have no dimension of space-time - which is covariant wrt. general coordinate transformation - Einstein, the writer).

Upgrading/ islakh: ( Really Hawking forgot his paradigm The anthropic principle is a quasi-metaphysical notion which implies that, if a particular universe does not take on fundamental constants of Nature, which allow for the existance of life and the development of intelligence, there will never be anyone to report its properties³⁾);

Schr dinger Formulae is the leading role in these issue; Mathematical Model (MM) of the universe has 2 boundary conditions / God desire;

1. Einstein General Relatuvity.

2. No boudary of the space - time.

Hawking forgot with the quantum description of Bohr. If in room -1, situation-1, one can not using its paradigm (in singularities) then we must change to the other room-2 the law of the quantum cosmology. Then we find of the two facts , anthropically - the way it is, the real world & the imaginary world/ the here-after as shown at figure 4, those are the absolute truth due to they refer to the vacuum / THE REALITY that absolute in its space-time.

We found that nature contains many fundamental numbers (=standard measure as ISO). These standard numbers have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life. We found also the meaning of the relativity and the absolute thing, anthropically. With the last thing we could found and define THE GOD scientifically.

Aufgehoben, upgrading of this chapter-1, on base of the anthropic principle and Bertrand Russell aphorism, must be shared to Stephen Hawking; These would be merely influencing political and social destiny of human being, complex idea of opinion with practical implications that has never been before.

SCIENTIST neurobiolog Hubel (1979), before starting to write his SCIENTIFIC message about "the Brain"; Questioning first about the definition or the meaning of the words "mind" & "understand":

Can the brain understand the brain? Can it understand mind? I think the difficulties with questions such as these are semantic. They are loaded with words such as "understand" and "mind", useful words for many purposes but fuzzy at the edges and out of place when they are applied to questions such as these, which they render either meaningless or unanswerable.

The problem comes when we ask about understanding, because such a word carriers with it the implication of a sudden revelation or dawning, the existance of a moment when we might be said to leave the darkness of the tunnel. It is not clear to me that there can be such a moment, or that we will know when it comes.⁴⁾

Hawking said: " Up to now, most scientist have been too occupied with the development of new theories that describe what the universe is to ask the question why. On the other hand, the people whose bussiness is to ask why, the philosophers, have not been able to keep up with the advance of scientific theories. In the eighteen century, philosopher considered the whole of human knowledge, including science, to be their field and discussed questions such as : Did the universe have a beginning? However, in the nineteen and twentieth centuries, science became too technical and mathematical for the philosophers, or anyone else except a few specialists. Philosophers reduced the scope of their inquiries so much that Wittgenstein, the most famous philosopher of this century, said, "The sole remaining task for phylosophy is the analysis of language." What a come down ...... " ⁵⁾

Analysing of the meaning of a word and the description idea argumentation are sufficient, probably. Because philosophy is as a "Mother Ship", air craft carrier to batter down and smoothing the way for the troop landed, or science; These are sufficient, because science can't do it - haven't the capability in doing so.

Say, that the definition of "mind" and "understand" and another abstract words could have been defined precisely, then mathematics, and technical equipments such as a microscope, micro electrode, Cobe, EEG, ECG ... and computer, probably, would batter down the next way then scientific prediction would be easily and quickly observed.

Before we are going to the abstract words, non material, we will give an example of the simple material words, a sentence such as; "Where is Tini?" equivalent in morphology to the question of chapter-2 ; "Where is the mind?" that modern scientists coouln't answer. Then we would try with the easy question; where is Tini, she is the daughter of Mr Sukarno, our neighbour. It could be that Tini is going out from home. Going to where, no body knows, maybe she is going home to village, to Jakarta, to Sumatara or Kalimantan, we do not know. Then in searching her, we have to give her identity, to the police and society, such as her height, weight, photo, the color of the hair and skin, her ages .... etc. For completing we should have given her behavioral objectives, the identity of 1. cognitive. 2. affective. 3. psychomotoric this is the definition of Tini.

The definition of "mind" ; What is mind? Mind is splitted in two principle senses; 1. The individual mind is the self or subject which perceives, remember, .... imagines, loves .... etc. and which is functionally related to individual bodily organism. 2. Mind, generally considered, is metaphysical substance which pervades all individual minds and which is contrasted with matter or material substance. This meta physical mind understand through something that dwelling in human mind, "khudhuri", "emanating" something that present from outside (the Mind of God). Look Apdx 2.1 !

Hawking's hopeless: "We have, as yet, had little success in predicting human behavior from MM" ... Russell's , We have to grapple it ! Then now we have HDA, we need to underline/ add that due to now science growth have attaining a great progress in mathematics & technique, until one can do by using computer, micro electrode, EEG, Cobe, then either the abstract, unseen, phenomenons in the brain or behavioral phenomenons could be plotted as curves or another that every one could see and understand, means, comprehendsible to every body and no paradoxical phenomenons found.

Prof. Hawking apologize that he introduce one mathematical formulae in his book, that is E = mc², to the reader of his book; So we apologize too for involving the one and only the Q formulae above in order that one could explore to all human behavior then explaining. Behavioral objective in the brain when someone thinking about in solving a problem plotted by the "saw" - pulses of electrical voltages that could be analysed very accurately by analysing the Q with its variables of h1, h2, h3.

# The picture of the "tapestry"/ universe in the Vacuum and the picture of the "saw pulses" in the brain's synapses; And by these two , fortunately, we could solving the conundrum, then arguing;

(1) Dealing with "tapestry", we could attain the relative versus the absolute - metaphysical substance; Mind and Imaginary world.

(2) For the "saw pulses" we could explain Rational Intelligence - RI; Emotional Intelligence - EI; Psychomotoric Intelligence - PI that many scientists dare not to enter, for explaining in detail especially, as shown below.

With those two, "tapestry" in the Vacuum and "saw pulses" in the brain's synapses, every one would has the capability in exploring the law/ paradigm of the nature and of the human being in a simple idea and could "understand" those complex facts/ realities due to they emerging to us as a simple problem/ one.

Now, come again the word "understand" that Hubble gives up! ..... It is not clear to me that there can be such a moment, or that we will know when it comes ....

The definition of "understand", what is the meaning of understanding of something; Going back the identity of the behavior of "Tini" which is the same with the identity of the behavior of "mind", due to the mind is the self which is the perfomer; Then it is necessary to analyse the implication of those 3 behavioral objective, as stated above.

" At the time of the saw pulses of voltage in the neuron crosses the abcis is the time of the one understand the answer of the problem to be solved." The hardware of the mind is the brain, while the software is the formulae of the R - C - L series with pulses of voltage at the input. "Where is the mind?" Probably, the verification of the HDA theory, that is, the behavior of the thought of the one understanding or not understand that abstracted by the MM of HDA that match with its measurements ( measured in the synapses cleft of the neuron by US scientist) is the answer where is the mind?; So, mind is in the neurons of our brain !! ⁶⁾

With pin point, or, excact and accurate verification then professor Baiqunni agrees and saying with his alluring eyes OK, all right, after I, the writer, show those two "saw voltage" are in agreement!

Figure 6: NOT UNDERSTAND Figure 7: UNDERSTAND

Figure 7: The voltage in the brain at the time one understand in solving a problem, note that only 2 steps then the saw voltage becomes zero, due to the high of Q so emotional one ( R increase, so Q decrease) make one become dull!

One who has wisdom, prophet, fortune teller as Ronggowar si to, also Stephen Hawking himself (at the time he saw, found the black hole paradigm) could understand then formulating them, those are not RI rational approach but EI approach.

Scientist always using RI approach then they could arguing and explaining in scientific approach. After we could comprehend the meaning of "understand" from those figures above , then the meaning of RI & EI from those figures 6 & 7 could be easily grasped:

One's Q Q = 1/R (L/C) or Q = 0,005 h1 (h2 x h3)

Individual does not understand Q=0,0045 0,005 x 3 ( 3 x 3 ) = 0,045

Rational approach- RI Q= 0,5 0,005 x10 ( 10 x 10 ) = 0,5

Emotional approach- EI Q = 0,5 0,005 x 33 (3 x 3) = 0,5 , so though he is dull with h3 =3, then due to he has Q = 0,5 so the saw voltage of 15 mV , would become zero quickly , that's he has understood well ! The voltage of ERP (event related potentials) 8 mV in almost 2 second going down to zero , one can say he understand!

Psychologist Robert Ornstein has written:

"It means that a consequency of the structure of our mind is that if awareness is restricted at a constant stimulus, a turning off" - consciousness come from the outside world."

General instruction for meditation all underline of this.⁷⁾

How do we try to do, in order, our meditation succeed; In short, we must make the Q=0,5 or higher! In making the value of h1,2,3 attaining 10, there are many way as stated, instructed by Ornstein, Bloomfield, who has wisdom, prophets, ..... meditate, pray, harmonic movements, feast ....... etc. The problem would be - the coming of rewards - or, the answer of the problem, or, something coming from outside that really present into our consciousness, "Hudhuri" the Mind of God present! If present, then all of the problems would be solved!

In the plain language - make yourself to be in "firmness" condition (geleng - Java langguage; jahadu - Arabics; due to we have look around at all the reasons) to solve, to say yes ....... to be "champion minded" ; Probably it is very difficult in ascertaining the linkage, the coming, of the Mind of God. We need the mizan, standard praxis of it !!!

2.2.4 WHERE IS THE MIND?

We find the mind in the brain, as the hardware of the mind (It is to be noted that mind is an abstract thing, means it has no space and time dimension; So we can not say that we have found it there in the brain; But the mind manipulated praxis there). Then where else we could find the mind's manipulation?

# At the clay or sand; We know the moment the emerging of one cell bacteria is when the very strong forces, cathasthrope, act upon a clay or sand, result in the more complex molecules in a sudden and non linear shift, similar as the skin af the one cell bacteria (Prigogine, 1980) then become .. the bacteria.⁸⁾

Three billions ago happened slow process of biological evolution, that bring organism starting from the simplest (one cell) to the creation of us - human being (Hawking) It means that from

" U N D E R S T A N D "

Tegangan di otak saat orang mengerti penyelesaian satu masalah, perhatikan hanya 2 langkah lalu teg. gergaji menjadi nol, karena Q besar jadi emosi menjadikan bodoh!

Dengan verifikasi yang pin point atau tepat dan teliti tersebut, maka prof. Baiquni dengan berbinar mengiyakan saat saya ajukan/ perlihatkan kepadanya kedua gambar gigi gergaji itu.

# Di tanah atau debu; Kita tahu saat terjadinya binatang ber the sand becoming biologist including human and flora are living creature which have Mind.⁹⁾

# James Jean: " .... The mechanism of the sun system known that could arrange the planets in the orderly manner that we find them. Nevertheless, the overall organization of the universe has suggested to many a modern astronomer an element of design. Thus James Jeans, who proclaimed that "the universe appears to have been designed by a pure mathematician" and it "begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine" ;

" We discover that the universe shows evidence of designing or controlling power that has something in common with our own individual minds - not, so far as we have discovered, emotion, morality, or aesthetic appreciation, but the tendency to think in the way which, for want of a better word, we described as mathematical."¹⁰⁾.

God desires, having mind, boundary conditions - No Boundary Condition- at the time HE desire to design the universe. (Hawking)

# Why does the universe obey the law? Due to The Anthropic Principles.¹¹⁾ (DR. Phillips -1997).

Universe is biological entity that create and construct itself; All lived biology have Mind.¹²⁾ (Lee Smolin)

The source of the positive Laws (KUHP) are Nature - Civilazation and Religion/ Wahyu; On base of those sources made into the positive law by the mind So the Law of Nature.

That's why the law is (on base of) mind! Then due to the Law is on base of mind and the Universe obey the Law that's why the Universe have Mind.

At last, we find the Mind in the dust/ clay - materials universe - biology including Homo Sapien - the Universe - and God Himself It's simple these are the answers of the second question of Aristotle.

(Note, please look also Notes of ^{8) - 12)}, with TOE approaches!)

Probably, the Universe is on base of, or contains, standard measures/ mizan; Then the standard measure, mizan of every thing must be discovered and collected (TOE) Then for the future nature and the creature - human would live harmonizely .... becoming WORLD PEACE.

Look at Appendix 2.2, standard measure of ideal h1,2,3 = 10; Q = 0,5; Allocated Energy attained by the ideal individual= 3.10¹⁸ Joules; Life span of ideal individual= 120 years! ..... etc.

APPENDIX 2.1 : The United of Natural Sciences of Schr dinger/ Bohr - Einstein/ Hawking with Social Philosophy of Karlina, Descartes, Islamic Philosophy and Philosopy; Result in the definition of MIND.

# And so for the Schr dinger formulae; MM of Schr dinger - which none comparable to it - involved a boundary condition, that is, boundary condition -1 it happened Fact-1 a material world; Boundary condition 2 it happened Fact-2 _ a wave. The first time physical formulae involves a desire/ mind of the one at the year of 1945 he wrote a book "What is Life" ; Not a question of philosophy due to involving a physical & chemical formulae then opening the door of the beginning of life!

# It exactly the same for constructing the universe; Boundary condition 1 = MM Einstein's General Relativity ; Boundary condition 2 = Quantum Cosmology - No Boundary Proposal as the desire of God; It happened the Facts of the real world & the imaginary world/ Here After.

# Events happened in the mind is the same. Mind wanted to drink due to the self is thirsty would see a glass/fact -1; The mind missing his 2 friends would see his 2 heads/ Fact 2.

# I think then I am; Imagine of one that his thought is not in normal succession, he could be mad, suffer from thought illness, .. Then probably there is none responding him, because he is not absent!

According to Descartes, the one and only of the certainty (is the embryo of "the absolute truth", the writer) is on base of mind and thought expressed in terms of "cogito ergo sum" - "I think then I am". The mind and the brain are correlated each other, though they differ in dimension.

Karlina: "In science now have been received that SCIENCE is not merely "the world existing outside there"; Fact is a tied in, texture, of I or "the self" and the object of the world outside there - outside "the self" ; Then REALITY that exist out side of us, have always to be questioned still."

From the argumentation above we could resumed: " The texture, tied in REALITY and MIND result in, REALITY 's symptoms, FACTS"

Probably, this is the answer of Bohr's Bohr interpreted the quantum mechanical paradoxes are reflecting basic limits to the mind's ability to conceptualize reality.

Hudhuri Knowledge/ Islam Philosophy: According to philosophy language, awareness brightness are called " the knowledge of the present" ;

The principle of epistemology are at the differentiation between the knowledge through concept or conceptualization and the knowledge through presentation. Accurately differentiation between the knowledge based on concept in mind about something that not present in mind, with the knowledge on based of something present by itself in mind and which its exsistance is not separated from the knowledge of it.

That is explained more about emanasi (= dwelling in human mind) in cosmology as correlated with the knowledge - God present.

In short "I"/ mind, is splitted in two : 1. I performative/ performer. 2. I metaphysics, correlated with the knowledge that "present".

Philosophy : MIND : (Lat. mens) Mind is used in two principal senses : (a) The individual Mind is the Self or Subject which perceives, remembers, imagines, feels, conceives, reasons, wills, etc. and which is functionally related to individual bodily organism. (b) Mind, generically considered, is a metaphysical substance which pervades all individual minds and which is contrasted with matter or material substance. - Ledger Wood.

INTENTIONALITY : The property of consciousness whereby refers to or intends an object. The intentional object is not necessarily a real or existent thing but is merely that which the mental act is about. Intentionality is the modern equivalent of the scholastic intentio;

In Husserl: 1. (broadest sense) The character of anything as "intending" or pointing beyond itself; self-transcendence. 2. (most frequent sense) The character of consciousness as pointing beyond itself, as consciousness of something , and as having its horizon of co-intendings; noetic intentionality. _ Dorion Cairns.

INTELLECT : The cognitive faculty of the mind as it operates at higher abstarct and conceptual levels._L.W. St. Agustine distinguish the intelect from reason; Intelection would be impossible witout reason. The intelect is the soul itself. It rules the soul. Sometimes the intelect is called intelligentia . Both the intellect and reason are innate in the mind. Reasons seeks knowledge or science , while the intellect , which is higher , aims at wisdom, sapientia, or contemplation of eternal things, and especially God. - J.J. Rolbiecki.

Quantum Debate, Einstein - Bohr (John Gliedman 1983) : Einstein's; "I dont belive that God play dies with the universe" He didn't believe - did not willingness to receive - that the law of nature is determinism - orderly - then also indeterminant - disorder;

It implies that you may have to take virtually the whole universe into account when seeking the true causes of a physical event. Einstein said you didn't have to.

Quantum theory postulates a kind of long-range Siamese twin effect whenever two subatomic particles collide and then go their different ways. Even when the particles are halfway across the universe from each other, it says, they instantaneously respond to each other's action.

And in so doing, they violate relativity's ban on faster-than-light velocity.

Bohr interpreted the quantum mechanical paradoxes are reflecting basic limits to the mind's ability to conceptualize reality. In visual perception,a shift of attention is often enough to trigger perception of the other figure in the ambigious pattern - to change the face into two profiles. In quantum physics, according to Bohr, a shift in the scientist's experimental setup achieves a somewhat analogous change in his "perception" of a subatomic particle. In one experimental arrangement, the physicist "sees" a particlelike electron; in another setup that is complementary, he "sees" a wavelike electron.

Judged by the traditional criteria of science, quantum theory was indeed fatally flawed. It provided no explanation whatever for why individual subatomic particles behave as they do, and it compounded this omission by dissolving the clear line between what we know about reality and reality itself (reality = facts, while reality itself is REALITY = Vacuum Space = GOD TOE !). This was enough to cause Einstein renounce quantum theory even though he acknowledged that it was a fantastically accurate prediction machine.

Bohr's positivism led him to draw the opposite conclusion; since quantum theory uses only those concepts that can be defined through subatomic masurements, scientist must accept the fact that undefineble concepts such as causality and objective reality have no place in atomic physics.

Quantum theory is the best that human reason can do when confronted in the atomic domain by a kind of scientific Great Wall of China - a permanent barrier to new human understanding of physical reality. ...

As far as man's limited reason is concerned,"There is no quantum world . There is only an abstract quantum physical description. It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature."

One can almost hear Bohr saying to Einstein what he once said to his son in a discussion about physics: "You are not thinking ; you are merely logical" .. Einstein was trying to think logically about phenomena that resist ordinary logic.

Undaunted, Einstein wrote to his friend the phyicist Erwin Schrodinger (who shared Einstein's skepticism even though he was one of the new theory's principle architects) that "The Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilizing philosophy - or religion? - is so delicately contrived that, for the time being , it provides a gentle pillow for the true believer from which he cannot very easily be aroused ...... But this religion has .... damned little effect on me."

.... Thus wrote Einstein, the EPR pradox forces us to relinquish one of the following assertion:

1. The quantum mechanical description of atomic behavior is complete

2. The real states of spatially separated objects are independent of each other. In other words, if you believe that quantum theory is complete, you're stuck with its incredibly subversive holism.

The Nobel Laureate P.A.M. Dirac: "It seems clear that the present quantum mechanics is not on its final form", said Dirac in 1979. He added :"It might very well be that the new quantum mechanics will have determinism, quite possible that Einstein will turn out to be correct." ¹⁷⁾

But probably from the data of this Appendiks I, we could give the answers, as stated below:

After science could differentiate the Universe and the Vacuum (=REALITY) then probably SCIENTIST, including general peoples, having the ability to find and define GOD scientifically;

Introducing; The definition of Mind which include the Mind of GOD and also defining of Fact, " The texture, tied in REALITY and MIND result in, REALITY 's symptoms, FACTS"New approaches: 1. If you believe that quantum theory is complete, you're stuck with its incredibly subversive holism.

On the problem of what is matter, the above (TOE) has explained that, The Facts depend on the Mind

Just the formulae or Mathematical Model of Schrodinger is some thing that none comparable to it;

If our mind involve in it, the boundary condition -1 would produce Fact-1 , material world;

If involving the boundary -2 would produce Fact-2 , the wave.

So: Talking about facts we must linkage to The Wholeness = REALITY = GOD = non comparable to it; In other words, The quantum mechanical description of atomic behavior is complete !!!

2. Dirac: He added :"It might very well be that the new quantum mechanics will have determinant in the Einstein wanted ........ I think it is .....quite possible that Einstein will turn out to be correct.

According to Le Comte Du Nouy : Classic orderly or determinism; Quantum or statistic Order is born from disorder [look ¹⁸⁾ ! ]

That is why those two are orderly or Einstein determinism is right after all.

And referring to Holism/ REALITY/ the absolute would make one could define the Absolute and relative Truth ; "As long as one refers to REALITY they are absolute right; As long as rationalities consistent with the facts they are relative right ".

Note that the first paradigm is "open law" involves the second too; If rationality is hudhuri, come from the REALITY, then it is an absolute truth/ right.

APPENDIX 2.2 :

HUMAN DYNAMICAL ANALOGIES:

A GIANT STEPS : (1) Human behavior and dynamical behavior of nature to be united by HDA theory;

HDA theory, Human Dynamical Analogies theory; With DA - Dynamical Analogies theory one unites Electrical- Mechanical - Nature behavior, due to their mathematical models (MM) is the same ; while human and nature behaviors are united due to that they have 5 variables and those 5 nature variables having the same characteristics with those 5 human variables.

Rollo Handy, 1964: "The discovery of an analogy between human behavior and the behavior of some other system, (whether computer, solar system, meteorological system etc.) make some inquirers quite convinced that a revolutionary step forward either has been taken or is about to be taken; But as often happens, the initial enthusiasm may be followed by disillusionment (R. Handy, Methodology of ...., 1964, p.46) .... HYPOTHESIS .... VERIFICATION OF HDA: From observation research then discovered, that nature and human system having 5 variables and those properties are precisely the same; Construction of Hypothesis;

After deduction, is there any consequence of it? Then, come the verification, Is the MM consistent with their measurement of the "saw" voltage in the synapses?; The behavior of electrical circuit (that analog with human behavior) have been tried explained by the behavior of electron/ Quantum by scientist, but he fails!;

By the smart trick of MM of modern statistics The average values of emotional voltages from the "AC" formulae equalised to those from the "DC" formulae, fortunately, found the value of the smallest voltage of the problems (=quantum), E_H = 2 V; That is why we could calculate the values of any other standard measure/ size, antrophi

cally, really (truth - could be measured). Look at the values of the standard measure of HDA at Figure 8

From long ago, thousands years before Christ since Greeks civilization, the philosopher and psichology have used those three division; the behavioral objectives of cognitive, psichomotoric & affective behaviors.

At the year of 1875 we made standard measure/ dimension of length "1 meter ". And now we make standard dimension for the level of ikhlas(`h_1`), level of amal (`h_2`) and level of sulton (`h_3`). For ideal man, one that becomes model, ideal for every body due to their properties and potention, would be valued as 10 for their `h_1`,``h_2`,``dan``h_3`. And those three would be valued 1 for the reverse of the ideal man or one that most far away from the ideal. So, featuring for all human would get the certain position in the continuum of 1-10 or its value `h_1`,``h_2`,``dan``h_3` is in 0-10 interval.

By measuring `h_1`,``h_2`,``dan``h_3` in the standard of the behavior of human we constructed/ made then would be found;

`Q~=~5.10^{-3}``h_1``sqrt{h_2``.``h_3}`

CALCULATING THE Q OF SOMEONE:

`Q``=``5.10^{-3}``h_1``sqrt{h_2`.``h_3`} , assumed `h_1``=``h_2``=``h_3``=10`

Q = 0,005 x 10 x `sqrt{10`X`10}``=``0.5

Q = 0,005 x 2 x `sqrt{~`2``X``2} = 0,02 ; `h_1``=``h_2``=``h_3``=``2

DEFINITION, "GOOD" : "All of the behavior that increasing the value of Q is good & the reverse one that lowering the Q is bad, to be noted Qmax = 0,5 physics (17/33) ........ .. / - means and, or !

. DEFINITION, "UNDERSTAND" " At the time the saw voltage in the neuron crosses the abscis is the time one understand the answer of the problem."

. DEFINITION, "QUALITY" " The worst of man is the one whose h1, h2 and h3 having the lowest value, hi=1, its Q is the lowest = 0,005" , the best his Q = 0,5 , formulae of quality: `Q~=~5.10^{-3}~h_1``sqrt{h_2``.``h_3}

one's Q = 0,02 0,045 0,08 0,125 0,180 0,320 0,500

`h_1``=``h_2``=``h_3` = 2 3 4 5 6 8 10

Probably now yau are ready to look and comprehend HDA curves:

REFERENCE: 1. "Thet", The Theory of HDA; Taufik Rusdi (1987); Supervised by Prof. Baiquni ; 1700 pages, 1000 pages in mathematical formulae ; more than 100 book referred;

2. The Mind of God - Paul Davies ; 1992

3. Scientific America - 1979

And many others. 14 Juli 2000; Taufik Rusdi

1). Bertrand Russell, 1965 , p. 221;

Atau dari: Syafi'i Maarif, Perspektif Islam dalam Pembangunan Bangsa, PLP2M, Yogyakarta, 1987, p. 218.

"Not only will men of science have to grapple with science that deal with man - but, and this is a far more difficult matter - they will have to persuade the world to listen to what they have discovered. If they can not succeed in these difficult enterprise, man will destroy himself by his halfway cleverness. I am told that, if he were out of the way, the future would lie with rats. I hope they will find it a pleasant world, but I am glad I shall no be there."

2). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time , Transworld Publisher LTD, London, 1988, p. 1.

3). J.P. Mc Evoy and Oscar Zarate, Stephen Hawking for Beginners, Icon Book Ltd., Cambridge, 1995, p. 165

4) David H. Hubel "A Scientific American Book", The Brain, (September 1979), Vol: ...., p. 3.

Can the brain understand the brain?

5). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time , Transworld Publisher LTD, London, 1988, p. 174.

6) Eric R. Kandel "A Scientific American Book", The Brain, (September 1979), Vol: ., pp. 29; 38.

Many neuro-biologists believe that the unique character of individual human beings, their disposition to feel, think, learn and remember , will ultimately be shown to reside in the precise patterns of synaptic interconnections between the neurons of the brain.

The Mind is not material substance; It has no dimension of space - time. So it is not correct to say that the mind resides in the precise pattern of synaptic interconnections between the neurons. Probably we can say that the mind manipulates thinking process there!

7) Robert Ornstein (& Claudio Naranjo) , On the Psychology of Meditation, A Viking Compass Book, New York, 1972; p. ...

8) Marilyn Fergussen, The Aquarian Conspiracy, Granada, Great Britain , 1982, pp.25;175,176,177,178

# 1980 Discovery - Prigogine's Transformation explaining how is man built from sand, clay.

# In order we could understand well with the wholeness approaches, we must "verstehen", that is, to look at the all process of Prigogine transformation of the existence of man in 4 steps, that begin from the clay to one cell bacteria .........then misising link of 700gr of his brain transformed into 1300 gram of its weight .......this homo-sapiens at the time of 1000 BC had ever "transformed" into "the most beautiful civilization through all time", due to their altruist/ taqwa/ return ..... at the end of this twentieth century 2 conditions; their knowledge is ended, steady state, almost 90 % have been attained, then having the capability to understand the religion/ Qur`an, though paradox -and- in the time of violence disturbances, catastrophe, critically stressed (Nur, 55) then all of human being, globally, would begin to transform into higher rank of "insan kamil" - ideal man! Who left behind - does not join due to egoist, low of h1, would die or becoming fasek, degraded human!

Prigogine's theory resolves the fundamental riddle of how living things has been running uphill in a universe that is supposed to be running down. And the theory is immediately relevant to every day life - to people. It offers a scientific model of transformation at every level. It explains the critical role of stress in transformation - and the impetus towards transformation inherent in nature!

As we shall see, the principles revealed by the theory of dissipative structures are valuable in helping us understand profound change in psychology, learning, health, sociology, even politics and economics.

Next, remember that a deep level of nature, nothing is fixed. These patterns are in constant motion. Even a rock is a dance of electrons.

Now think about the meaning of the word complex ; braided together. A complex structure is connected at many points and in many ways. The more complex a dissipative structure, the more energy is needed to maintain all those connections. Therefore it is more vulnerable to internal fluctuations. It is said to be `far from equilibrium'

The more complex or coherent a structure, the greater the next level of complexity. Each transformation makes the next one likelier. Each new level is even more integrated and connected than the one before, requiring a greater flow of energy for maintenance, and is therefore still less stable. To put it another way, flexibility begets flexibility. As Prigogine said, at higher levels of complexity, `the nature of the laws of nature changes.' Life `eats' entropy. It has the potential to create new forms by allowing a shake up of old forms.

One recently reported example of a new dissipative structure occurred when bacteria were placed experimentally in water, a medium in which this strain was unaccustomed to live. They began to interact in a highly organized way that enabled some of their number to survive.

The Zhabotinskii reaction, a dissipative structure in chemistry, caused something of a sensation among chemist in the 1960s. In this dramatic example of nature creating patterns in both space and time, beautiful scroll-like forms unfold in a solution in a laboratory dish while the colors of the solution oscillate, changing from red to blue at regular intervals. Similarly, when certain oils are heated, a complex pattern of hexagons appears on the surface. The higher the heat, the more complex the pattern. These shifts are sudden and non linear. Multiple factors act on each other at once. [ These are the analogy of when the very strong forces, catastrophe, act upon a clay or sand, result in the more complex molecules in a sudden and non linear shift, similar as the skin af the one cell bacteria].

Human society offers an example of spontaneous self-organization. In a fairly dense society, as individuals become acquainted with others, each soon has more points of contact throughout the system via friends and friends of friends. The greater the instability and mobility of the society, the more interactions occur. This means greater potential for new connections, new organizations, diversification. Much as certain cells or organs in a body specialize during the course of evolution, people with common interests find one another and refine their speciality by mutual simulation and exchange of ideas. ....

Critical perturbations - `a dialectic between mass and minority' - can drive the society to `a new average'. Societies have limited power of integration, he said. Any time a perturbation is greater than the society's ability to `damp' or repress it, the social organization will (a) be destroyed, or (b) give way to a new order.

9) Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time , Transworld Publisher LTD, London, 1988, p. 124

10) Paul Davies, The MInd of God , The Penguin Book, London, 1993, pp. 202-203.

11) Tim CIMM, Millenium Evening - Stepheh Hawking , Mizan, Bandung , 1998, p. 129-130.

Tanya Jawab III

12) Paul Davies, The MInd of God , The Penguin Book, London, 1993, pp. 173; 211-2

13) Tim CIMM, Millenium Evening - Stepheh Hawking , Mizan, Bandung , 1998, pp. 19.

Karlina: Dalam dunia sains sekarang telah disadari bahwa ilmu pengetahuan bukan semata mata "dunia yang ada di luar sana". Dengan kata lain, seluruh alam semesta (=fakta, penulis) itu adalah jalinan antara subyek "Aku" sebagai pemaham dan obyek dunia yang ada di luar sana.

14) Hamdani ,Ilmu Khudhuri, Mizan, Bandung, 1980, p. .....,

15) Dogobert D. Runes, Dictionary of Philosophy, Littlefield, Adams & CO, Paterson, New Jersey , 1963, p. 198.

16) Ibid., pp. 147-148.

17) John Gliedman, "Einstein - Against the Odds: The Great Quantum Debate" Science Digest, (June 1983); pp. 74 - 80 , 109.

TOE approach: 1. If you believe that quantum theory is complete, you're stuck with its incredibly subversive holism.

On the problem of what is matter, TOE has explained that

The Facts depend on the Mind

# Just the formulae or Mathematical Model of Schrodinger is some thing that none comparable to it;

If our mind involve in it, the boundary condition -1 would produce Fact-1 , material world;

If involving the boundary -2 would produce Fact-2 , the wave.

So: Talking about facts we must linkage to The Wholeness = REALITY = GOD ; In other words, The quantum mechanical description of atomic behavior is complete !!!

2. Dirac: He added :"It might very well be that the new quantum mechanics will have determinism in the Einstein wanted ........ I think it is .....quite possible that Einstein will turn out to be correct.

According to Le Comte Du Nouy :

Classic orderly or determinism

Quantum or statistic Order is born from disorder [look ¹⁸⁾ ! ]

That is why those two are orderly or Einstein determinism is right after all.

18) Lecomte du Noüy, Human Destiny, Mentor Book, New York, 1947, p.30

The first is that it was necessary for the reader to understand clearly that all our scientific laws at present rest on chance, that is to say, on the hypothesis of an absolute disorder at the base. If molecules, atoms, and electrons were not submitted to "perfectly disorder" motions, our statistical reasoning would not lead us to definite laws. Now, these laws of nature express a remarkable harmony on our scale of observation. It can therefore, be said that, from our point of view of man, order is born from disorder.

Solo 21 September 2002

[ ]

JUMLAH NERON DI OTAK, BINTANG DI GALAXI & GALAXI DI UNIVERSE SEMUA 100 MILYAR

Dari semut sampai gajah, otaknya terjadi dari sel sel yang dinamakan neuron, dengan fitrah yang sama, dan jumlah neuron

manusia yang 100 milyar itu tak ada makhluk bumi yang mengungguli. Karena pada binatang tingkat rendah, aplysia, jumlah neronnya tak terlalu besar hingga dapat langsung bisa dijangkau oleh jarum elektrode mikro dalam percobaan percobaan saintis. Dan saintis Kandel telah dapat memisahkan dengan presice & accurate antara input & output dari otaknya, seperti gambar berikut ini.

Badan neuron yang mempunyai cabang cabang pendek (dendrite) yang berfungsi menerima nerve impulses & satu Axon cabang yang besar sebagai transmitter pulsa syaraf; Dan ada 10 000 benang syaraf - nerve fibers - ( 10 000 kabel telpon dari pusat kantor telpon ,yang bersystem 10 000, ke abone/ rumah rumah) yang menyebar ke neron neron yang lain, sebagai penghantar dari informasi informasi yang berujut pulsa pulsa listrik yang dibangkitkan oleh ion ion kimiawi (neuro transmitter). Bisa dilihat dalam gambar diatas benang syaraf dari Axon itu terminalnya pada dendrite neron berujut knop knop kecil synapse.

Kalau ion ion, neuro transmitters, itu terlalu banyak mendekam di celah itu dan di banyak neron neron yang lain maka individu akan mengalami stress berat dan oleh obat anti stress ion ion itu dinetralisir, katakan tegangan listriknya menjadi nol, zero voltage. Stress akan hilang namun hanya sementara saja selagi obat stress itu berkhasiat, karena alamiahnya stress masalah yang diderita individu tetap exist hingga menimbulkan timbunan tegangan listrk itu lagi. Barangkali perlu kita tekankan lagi "Bahwasanya Qur`an/ Taqwa itu juga Obat/ syifak" bahwa amalan & keikhlasan orang akan meninggikan Q-kualitas orang yang berarti semua tegangan tegangan di neron neron akan meluncur ke nol semuanya; Atau dengan lain kata ....

semuanya ; Atau dengan lain kata ion ion yang tertimbun

di celah celah akan ternetralisir secara mutlak, dengan pengertian, tidak sementara namun seterusnya karena walau stress masalah itu tetap ada namun mekanisme otak - dengan pendekatan HDA yang semua perilaku neron itu sama dengan perilaku r,c,l sirkit listrik - dengan Q yang tinggi tadi menjadikan tegangan listrik terbuang (discharge); Dan perlu diketahui dengan mempertinggi ketaqwaan tadi tak ada efek samping-nya, sedang dengan obat/ pil anti stress tadi ada sisa bahan kimiawi yang merupakan sampah sampah yang bisajadi berbahaya bagi kinerja otak selanjutnya.

Gambar nerve fiber atau benang syaraf diatas persis seperti kabel listrik, yang ion ion atau elektron elektron bergerak didalamnya. Bayangkan gerakan elektron itu seperti gerakan kelereng yang kita isikan dalam pipa pralon dari Solo hingga Jakarta, dan dorongan di Solo hanya berkecepatan 10 meter/hari yang akan diikuti pula dengan gerakan kelereng di Jakarta; Jadi kecepatan elektron/kelereng itu lambat sekali, namun kecepatan informasi yang dibawanya secepat kilat saat kita menghentakkan dorongan pada kelereng pertama kali saat itu juga Jakarta sudah merasakan hentakan itu kecepatannya = kecepatan sinar 3 x 10⁸ meter/detik atau kira kira bolak balik Solo Jakarta 300 kali dalam 1 detik saja.

VERIFIKASI / BAYINAT DARI FORMULA HDA : Dari data pengukuran Kandel diatas didapatkan: (1) dalam 5 sec. ada 12 pulsa menurun ke nol ketemu æ = 0,083 ; (2) ketinggian pulsa pertama terhitung tinggi pulsa kedua, ketiga ...etc. Dengan 2 data ini dan formula HDA-nya kita masukkan computer dengan program Turbo Pascal, menghasilkan L7 & L10 diatas, yang hitam. Bayangkan dari hasil pengukuran Kandel yang semua saintis USA tak tahu artinya namun dengan Formula HDA yang mengabstraksikan gejala terukur itu secara precise & accurate kita menjadi tahu makna hasil pengukuran itu, karena hasil 2 bentuk fungsi gergaji yang sama itu atau hasil teori & experimen yang sama; Dan inilah bukti nyata atau verifikasi dari HDA theory. Kemlesetan pada tegangan yang rendah karena sangat mungkin mekanisme otak mempergunakan teknik AGC-automatic gain control yang menaikkan level tegangan rendah.

Dalam DA semua formula sirkit Listrik bisa dipakai menjadi formula Phisika & Mekanika dan dengan HDA semua formula listrik tadi bisa menjadi formula perilaku manusia termasuk pemikiran atau perilaku otak. Untuk mengkonstruksikannya butuh 25 tahun kerja keras, karena menyangkut system alam.

OTAK HARUS DG. PENDEKATAN "KOTAK-HITAM"

And now a breakthrough in the study of the brain does come. There is no scientific study more vital than the study of his own brain. Our entire view depend on it. (HDA, 1987) To understand man, we have to understand the brain. (Francis O Schmitt 1967) Pemahaman manusia akan rahasia otaknya dapat mengarah kepada semacam evolusi sosial yang dapat membantu mencerdaskan manusia, mencegah konflik konflik antar manusia dan antar bangsa, karena manusia telah dapat memahami dirinya sendiri dan pada giliran-nya ia dapat memahami orang lain. Menurut dia evolusi semacam ini diperlukan demi kelestarian species manusia.

Otak manusia merupakan misteri dunia biologis terbesar, frontir terbaru abad ini, dan barangkali frontir terakhir, yang dihadapi manusia dalam upaya mengexplorasi dan memahami dirinya sendiri. Pemahaman manusia tentang otaknya sendiri baru berada di ambang pintu perjalanan jauh. Perkembangan dan kecenderungan teknologi otak bergerak dari mitos {=dongeng, isapan jempol atau barang yang fiktip, hanya bayangan belaka; Masalahnya sekarang saintis modern telah menyatakan bahwa sesungguhnya `materi itu mitos' Schr dinger formula } menuju realitas. (Soejono Aswin 1988)

Mengapa "kotak hitam" ? Atau sebetulnya mengapa kita harus iman atau mempercayai bahwa itu yang betul? Kita hidup ini tidak bisa lepas dai unsur `percaya' namun juga jangan bodoh, kita gunakan akal sehat, misalnya dalam memakai kalkulator yang baru, kita coba dulu 7x7=49, 30:3=10, 2+3=5-2=3, 9=3 sesudah itu kita boleh percaya hasil hitungan yang jutaan rupiah itu tentu betul; Kita tanyakan kepada profesor kita yang selalu tepat jawabannya maka kita ikuti /percayai saja formulanya, petunjuknya, ijtihadnya; Kita cek, uji saja formula HDA, lalu orang pakai saja; Karena kalau orang harus membuktikan atau mengecek secara tuntas - mengerti dalam kotak hitam - kerjanya kalkulator, penelitian profesor etc itu akan butuh waktu yang panjang dan orang malah menjadi redundans, mengulang ulang yang buang enersi. Maka dari itu cek saja in & outnya dan kotak hitam kita anggap saja sebagai bolah ruwet, seperti saat kita/orang berkenaan dengan matematik.

Barangkali dalam pemahaman manusia tentang otaknya sendiri ini kita boleh memegang & mempercayai petunjuk Tuhan bahwa " Tuhan mengajar manusia dengan amsal. Amsal, sampel, simulasi atau contoh ajaran-Nya adalah Listrik " (24/35). Singkatnya, di kotak hitam otak itu ada arus listrik maka ia mempunyai sirkit equivalen-nya, simulator-nya. Bentuk tegangan pulsa listrik di input & output otak yang diukur oleh saintis Amerika Kandel persis sama dengan pulsa pulsa listrik dari teori HDA, itulah verifikasi. Lihat gambarnya di lain halaman !

Synapse itu "pusat relay" yang informasi listrik, yang dikerjakan oleh transmitter neron atau ion ion kimiawi, diangkut dari neron ke neron neron yang lain. Di celah (cleft) synapse terjadi penimbunan ataupun pengurasan dari transmitter kalau ada pulsa pulsa listrik datang, atau neron neron sedang aktif bekerja. Dan sekali lagi kinerja padanya itu dilakukan oleh ion ion yang nota bene adalah proses listrik, jadi orang boleh berpikir dan menjamunya, dealing with it, sebagai suatu sirkit listrik biasa. Secara common sense kalau ada suatu gejala/ arus listrik di suatu benda apapun, neron kek, synapse kek, air ludah kek, taik ayam kek, .....maka untuk benda tersebut tentu mempunyai "equivalent circuit-nya" atau sirkit penggantinya; Dan kalau kita bisa mendapatkan sirkit pengganti-nya maka kondisi hal itu dapat kita kuasai artinya bisa kita jamu sebagai sirkit listrik biasa dan seluruh konsekuensinya akan merupakan sifat & kondisi yang berlaku pula pada neron itu.

Pengukuran sinal sinal listrik dilakukan dengan penusukan dari jarum micro pada Synaptic Cleft/ celah synapse. (Eric F. Kandel ;"Scientific American Book", 1979);

Kalau ion ion, neuro transmitters, itu terlalu banyak mendekam di celah itu dan di banyak neron neron yang lain maka individu akan mengalami stress berat dan oleh obat anti stress ion ion itu dinetralisir, katakan tegangan listriknya menjadi nol, zero voltage. Stress akan hilang namun hanya sementara saja selagi obat stress itu berkhasiat, karena alamiahnya stress masalah yang diderita individu tetap exist hingga menimbulkan timbunan tegangan listrk itu lagi. Barangkali perlu kita tekankan lagi "Bahwasanya Qur`an/ Taqwa itu juga Obat/ syifak" bahwa amalan & keikhlasan orang akan meninggikan Q-kualitas orang yang berarti semua tegangan tegangan di neron neron akan meluncur ke nol semuanya; Atau dengan lain kata ....