1. HOW DOES GOD DESIGN AND BUILD THE UNIVERSE?1)
Scientific progress is usually measured in tiny steps. We build our understanding of the world slowly. Once
in a great while, however, a scientist will make a big step forward that explains a scientific truth. When that happens our
understanding of the world maybe changed to become new forever
1.1 INTRODUCTION
When we were young, remember one night playing with friends questioning occasionally ; " Who could count
the number of stars in the sky?"
Experience of Carl Sagan the director of NASA; We give little thought, except for children who want to know what a black
hole looks like, what is the smallest piece of matter, why we remember the past and not the future, ..... why there is a universe?
Most of parents and teachers are uncomfortable with issues like these, because they so vividly expose the limitations of human
understanding 2). ( * pp. ix )
Scientist's answer for the first question above, the number of stars in the sky: The sun, the earth, the
moon, Mercurius, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune & Pluto stars, those are The Solar System which are found
in The "Bima Sakti" (Milky Way) galaxy; In our galaxy, the same with another galaxies, are found the number of 100 billion
stars; In the sky are found Bima Sakti, Andromeda, .... , Spiral galaxy as many as those 100 billion too; So, the number of
stars in the sky are 100 billion times 100 billion that equal to 10 thousand billion billions = 1016. And those
are the universe, the earth and the sky which full of those stars, having the form not like a ball but like a "tapestry" or
"dried meat", flat - due to "inflation" effect - and stay in the Vacuum/ Nothingness/ uncomparable thing.
[The writer astonishes why the number of neurons in the brain are also 100 billion, and scientist James Jean
said that the process of the work of the universe is not like a "great machine " but is like our brain to think of = "great
thought"].
As we shall see, these writing abstracted from the books of the world's leading cosmologist Stephen Hawking;
1. A Brief History of Time, 1988; (* its page x written as pp. x) 2. Stephen Hawking for beginners, 1996;(**
its page x written as pps. x). Opening with the fundamental questions; Where did the universe come from, and where is it going?
Did the universe have a beginning, and if so, what happened before then? What is the nature of time? Will it ever come to
an end?
These Hawking's questions are essentially the old questions in new, more penetrating and more perspective
ways; the question first posed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle 2,500 years ago; How is the universe constructed? Where
is the mind? It is no wonder that up to this millennium we are still uncapable to answer those Aristotle's questions, except
Hawking for the first question, that we would see ahead soon.
And Aristotle said also that the odious inequality that has hitherto been a distinguishing mark of civilization,
is due to the lack of the knowledge, and the tendency to do excessively about oneself, egotism. That means if it is really
that natural sciences has been saturated, to match to the wholeness capacity, Hawking certainly could answer the first question
and there is no place for the egoism, due to scientist has been consensus.
Abstracted in short, in the year 1995, Hawking having the scientific approach - together with the General
Relativity of Einstein, Eddington, Schr dinger & Bohr; Quantum Cosmology of H&H, George Smoot; Expanding universe
of Friedmann, Hubble and many others - answering the great Greek philosopher Aristotle: "How is the universe constructed?
But unfortunately he got paradoxical answers, universe have a beginning and "no boundary condition universe" mean begin less
begin; In other words a beginning universe is a creation while begin less universe is not a creation begin less begin &
endless end of universe; There is big bang but there is no big bang, really.
That is why he longing for the emerging of TOE (Theory Of Every thing) that could explaining it, it should in time be understandable
in broad principle by every one, not just a few scientists, then we would know the mind of God.He added: "We have, as yet,
had little success in predicting human behavior from mathematical equations!" 3)
As said by Geston Bachelard, the philosopher, that modern men would be challenged by "contra mind" problems
right & wrong - good & bad unified become paradoxical facts. These paradoxical facts would become natural for our
grandchildren, said by Hawking; Until his last time Einstein refused those paradox with his known aphorism: "I do not believe
that God play dies with the universe" - means that the law of science is orderly, determinant, than he does not believe that
the law of science is also disorder - un-determinant.
So, if our knowledge, we, may now near the end of the search for the ultimate laws of nature, then our explanations
would be comprehends-able to every one, not only to scientists but ordinary people could understand it and do not involve
that paradox.
Say, that the writer is an electronic engineer and I would explain the working process of a television -
how could "a picture" transmitted from the transmitter station received by our TV set at home? Well, we would take one spool
of yarn, then using a ballpoint to draw a bird on it; We would slip off the top yarn, then we get a string of yarn with black
spots on it; As illustration, that the transmitted signal from the transmitter is this string of yarn, we would receive it
then slip on the spool again, then we would get a picture of a bird as the original one. Electrical wave signal transmitted
from the TV transmitter is identical with our string of yarn, conveying the signal for making raster or horizontal lines as
much as 600 lines (= slip on the yarn back to the spool), picture signal (= black spot on the yarn) say, practically, is only
"a brake laborer" ... with a meaning, that from the back of the CRT , cathode ray tubes, is transmitted electrons ray that
hit the phosphor escence screen so that it glows, glowing white; If the electrons ray is broken, by a brake laborer, slowing
the speed - then the glowing white becoming black spot. Black spots in the screen are identical with black spots of our yarn,
means that a picture of the bird would be on the screen. If the changing picture of the bird is transmitted 50 frames per
second that is the movie of the flying bird; If transmitted three string of yarn with green - blue - red spots, this would
result in color television! Those are the technology of television being understandable in broad principle by every one.
Likewise the explanation of the construction technology of the universe and the details would be left up
to the experts. Probably the giant progress in science, first, General Relativity of Einstein (=classics) that could explain
cosmology, universe - macro cosmos; The second, quantum theory of Planck could explaining the very small objects, abstract
- micro cosmos problems; Science is split ed into classics and quantum, and it looks like, first, it is necessary we comprehend
those two in broad principles (wholeness approach) dealing the issue context of the creation of the universe:
1.2 EINSTEIN’S GENERAL RELATIVITY
Several decades ago, who knew Einstein's theory is only 2 scientist - Bohr & Eddington. I have the book
of 500 pages of the theory given by a friend; More than 20 years I have read it but I do not understand, confused; Why? ...
Because "the wholeness aproach" explanations is not oriented in the book and also in the other books none telling the wholeness
orientations.
In Hawking's language: "Those theories are understandable in broad principle by every one, either scientist
or general peoples". Einstein's; "The idea of sciences are essentially simple, comprehendsible to every one". At the year
of 1995 one could easily found the wholeness orientation. And merely paradox with Newton's theory. According to Newton, that
the falling down of the apple to the earth is due to the gravitational force of the earth.
Einstein theory predicts that there is no gravitational force. Those happenning is that the apple is not
attracted by the earth, but the apple slides down into the earth environment. Einstein theory explains the correlation between
matter and space He found, that matter informs the space how to bend and then the space informs the matter how to move; So
there is no gravitational force as explained by Newton. The space around the earth, the matter with the great mass, would
bending it likes a "horn" or "cone" as shown by figure 1.; The greater of the mass would become the longer, bigger and greater
the mouth of the cone then the slipway of the apple/ stars would be more faster.
As illustration, while time goes on, due to the much number of matter in the sky - trapped stars, and slide
down stars into the "cone" of the black hole of the dark matter, then the longer the time the greater the mass of the matter
and the more the slipway stars, even the light is trapped also. The more darker of the matter the more wider of the mouth
of the "horn" then probably all of the stars in the galaxy is swallowed. ... Due to the growing process, that's why it is
possible accidently swallowing the universe .. not expanding but shrinkage universe that become the big crunch; Everything
going back to the singularity, supreme one if the "horn" is in action, sounded; General peoples could comprehend the above,
sounded horn that match with his imagination when universe collides. Look Fig. 1. 4)
Russian physicist and mathematician Alexander Friedmann threw away the cosmological constant of Einstein
relativity formulae and result in an expanding universe. ..... Einstein angry, but .... and eventually realizing that with
ë cosmological constant is a big mistake universe is not static. Friedmann's prediction of the expanding universe in term
of the ratio Ù (omega)
1. Universe mass density is bigger than the critical value, that is why expansion acceleration is slow and
the mass is so big enough for gravitation then breaking the expansion and reversing it; Big Crunch, Collapse into Singularity
; Ù > 1.
2. Mass density is smaller than the critical value. The universe is expanding rapidly which the gravitational
attraction can never stop it, though it does slow it down a bit; Ù < 1.
3. Mass density is equal to the critical value. The universe expand at a steady speed, just fast enough to
avoid re collapse. The speed at which the galaxies are moving apart get smaller and smaller, although it never quite reaches
zero; Ù =1. Look fig.2 ! (pp. 44)
A remarkable feature of the first kind of Friedmann model is that in it the universe is not infinite in space,
but neither does space have any boundary. We shall see when one combines general relativity with the uncertainty principle
of quantum mechanics, it is possible for both space and time to be finite without any edges or boundaries. 5) (pp.
44)
An easy way to understand these 3 problem above, perhaps we could imagine that this universe is similar to
a tennis ball thrown up high; The first throw, we throwing it uphigh, that is why the ball would go down to earth immediately.
The second throw with giant strength, so the ball break through the sky never come back. The third throw, thrown by an expert
mathematician with infinite strength, so by this throw the ball neither does penetrate the sky nor does go down, the ball
is floating in the sky ...... The tapestry/ universe is in the vacuum/ REALITY ..... At last one could only found 2 things
the tapestry & the vacuum creating the matter of the universe & the gravitation ...... or .... universe & God
.. the creation & the Creator.
Hawking said: "The initial rate of expansion also would have had to be chosen very precisely for the rate
of expansion still to be so close to the critical rate needed to avoid re collapse. This means that the initial state of the
universe must have been very carefully chosen indeed if the hot big bang model was correct right back to the beginning of
time. It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God
who intended to create beings like us". 6) (pp.127)
Then he said again: We do not know how many matter in this universe. As long as our investigation result
in that matters found in the universe is not sufficient enough to halt the universe expansion. That is why the universe will
probably expand forever. But if there is an extra dark of matter in nature which we have not yet detected, the universe is
going to re-collapse. But it would be the end of the universe and the end of time itself. There is not any way in continue-ing
the big crunch into a new big bang. But it is certain that if though the universe shrinkage, it will not crash down during
10 thousand million years ahead, since it has already been expanding for at least that long. 7) (But all we can
really be sure that the life span of the universe is 20 billion years; and Hawking does not agree the oscillating universe
; the writer)
An old paradox: Can God make a stone so big enough then God Himself can't lift it up? The answer of either
yes or no would implied that God is not Almighty 8) (=classical answer paradox). By orientations of "room 1" &
"room 2" of Bohr, we would let dis-appear that old paradox (quantum answer). Room1; we only deal with the almighty then God
is capable in making the most biggest of stone, not a problem; We will move to the other "room 2" that we only deal with God
having infinite desire - having initial condition - which the stone is so big enough and like tapestry or dried meat (universe)
having no boundary either its space or its time. Then having desired the tapestry slipped away into the Giant Cone (=God cannot
lift it up) .... no problem. Then God making big bang again (no problem); The problem is, "Is that the initial condition consistent
with the facts of our universe?". If they are consistent that's why the initial condition is right. ..... In Hawking language,
no boundary proposal seems consistent with the observation of our universe.
1.3 QUANTUM THEORY
Infinite small objects; Distribution is only in quanta. (Planck, 1900). In quantum level everything is complementary
pairs.
The most general physical properties of any system must be expressed in complementary pairs of variables,
each of which can be better defined only at the expense of the corresponding loss of the other definition. If the definition
is not complete, then they are compatible (Bohr)
The uncertainty principle & Virtual particles;
Heisenberg's uncertainty principles states that there are limits on how accurately we can observe certain
physical quantities, such as position, momentum, energy and even time. This is not a limit on our measuring instrument but
inherent characteristic of the universe, which does not reveal any quantity with absolute precision. 9) (pps.136)
Particle and antiparticle ; one of each pair will have positive energy; the other will have negative energy;
normally the two partners have find each other and when they do, they annihilate one another; Near the event horizon of a
black hole, there will be many pairs of virtual particles.
The uncertainty principles in fact predicts that energy can continuously appear on a scale determined by
Planck's constant (which is very small). But by Einstein's equation E=mc2, this energy can turn into particles
and anti-particles, popping in and out of existence. These are called virtual particles flickering everywhere just below the
threshold of observable reality. 9).
Schr dinger: The most elegant form of this language was an equation due to Schr dinger, the solution of which
- the wave function - determines the behavior of a system particles.10)
In other words, in its application of the mathematical model (MM), the result fact would depend on the boundary
condition (=initial conditions = self desire) applied on those Schr dinger's MM:
I. First boundary condition (self desire 1) "certainty" result in matter (p=h/ë) ;
II. Second boundary condition (self desire 2) "certainty" result in wave (E=nhí);
We have understood that MM itself is "certainty", but would result in either particle or wave is indefinite
; So, MM with boundary condition 1 result in fact of matter is certainty.
In general and short; MM (=REALITY = certainty) the Mind the Fact; Descartez' "Cogito ergo sum" = I think
then I am, is also a certainty; I Mind exist, the fact of our appearance; In context with the universe:
I. MM of the universe Mind/ classics real world
II. MM of the universe Mind/ quantum - No Boundary Proposal Imaginary world
Now, scientists / we treat the facts differently from the reality due to basic consideration that science
is the interpretation of facts; Science is not merely the world outside there; The facts is the texture between subject "I"
as the interpret- or and object of the world outside there interpreted is the vacuum or REALITY - outside of our Mind, omnipotent
.....infinite, there is none comparable to it which we never understand the REALITY itself. But according to Schr ädinger, REALITY would result in symptoms with two boundary condition
which complementary pairs (two of HIS desire) producing the fact that complementary too. Just imagine "dried meat" (real world
- tapestry) floating in nothingness / REALITY.
A rationality / description / MM of one thing would be a very difficult indeed to be understood without showing
one of the example or its fact. Then the very difficult Schr ädinger's MM either for scientist or non scientist need first their examples such shown above;
Then the description as said by Mr Schr dinger himself: "If the forces and barriers encountered by each particle
are known in the classical sense for a particular system, my equation can immediately be written down. The solution then gives
information about the system at all points in space and at all times. Wunderbar, ya!" ... It's a Miracle! he said ... Maybe
without examples shown above, probably only he himself knowing his utterance, and the one that really experts. 11)
1.3.1 UNIVERSE HAVE A BEGINNING
Using General Relativity, Hawking & Penrose showed that the classical concept of time must have begun
with a singularity at the Big Bang and thus the universe existed at one time in a hot, dense state. In 1964 measurement of
the facts of the echo or big bang radiation by Penzias & Wilson. And now the detectors of Cobe I were looking at the remnant
of the hot, dense state of the early universe which we call the big bang and also traced out a near perfect thermal radiation
curve for a back ground temperature of 2,725 degrees C above absolute zero. 12)
Thus Universe have a beginning is scientifically right !
1.3.2 BEGINLESS UNIVERSE
Hawking said: "It has always profoundly disturbed me that if the laws of physics could break down at the
beginning of the Universe, they could also breakdown anywhere else. That's why we have developed the No Boundary Proposal
which removes the singularity at the beginning of the Universe.
But there is a problem with cosmology because it can not predict anything about the Universe without an assumption
about the initial conditions.
Many peoples believe that this is how it should be and science should be concerned only with laws which govern
how the Universe evolves in time. They feel that the initial conditions for the Universe that determine how the Universe began
is a question for metaphysics or religion rather than science. 13).
At the starting point, Einstein's General Relativity predicts a singularity and the theory breaks down. It
is a classical theory and time and space can not be described by Einstein's equation when matter is crunched together at such
unbelievable densities. How can physics predict the beginning of the universe if all the laws break down at the big bang ?
14)
The only way is using quantum theory that is capable in solving the infinite small objects and called quantum
cosmology.
One thing new about cosmology, Hawking & Hartle (H&H) have used the mathematical trick of complex
time to examine all possible universes that might form from the initial quantum state. Time is divided into two separate components,
one imaginary and one real. Unlike real time, the imaginary component does not vanish at the big bang and the theory is thus
useful at the singularity. Standard quantum mechanical procedures are then used to arrive at a wave function for the Universe.
At the beginning of the Universe was used quantum approach as stated above: II. MM of the Universe/ REALITY
No Boundary Proposal Imaginary World, with imaginary time.
The No Boundary Proposal predicts a Universe that starts out in a very smooth and ordered way. It expands
by inflation first, then goes over to the standard hot big bang model, further expanding to a maximum radius before collapsing
to big crunch singularity in a disordered and irregular way. Real time ends at that point, but the Universe continues to be.
.. 15)
Fig. 1.3.2
Closed universe satisfy this restriction. They are finite but have no edges, something
like the two-dimensional surface of the earth. Depicted in this way, closed universe would have a beginning and an end, and
would therefore have boundaries only in real time. The imaginary component, however is continuous. So H & H make the
initial and final singularities of the closed universe dissappear. 16)
[The writer: These above are not right, probably, there lies the paradox of Hawking had in mind, even the
common sense of the non scientist would agree that the beginning of the universe verified by Noble Prize Winner Penzias &
Wilson, then proved without a doubt by Cobe I : Then he explained the beginning of the universe with quantum cosmology theory
perfectly. At last how could he said: "In imaginary time, there are no singularities or boundary (pp.139); However that may
be, the writer highly appreciate the Hawking's "No Boundary Proposal" & "the existence of either real or imaginary time"
look carefully Fig. 4 that the universe have no boundary either its space or its time, isn't it?]
Where did the universe come from ? How did the universe begin ? Mathematical calculations of Hawking involved
3 descriptions: "inflation" , "quantum fluctuation" , and "anthropic principles" ; If one could understand these last concept,
one should have a very good picture of Stephen Hawking's universe.
1.3.3 ANTHROPIC
We begin with - what is anthropic? From Cogito ergo sum, I think then I am Because we are exist that's
why we think or comprehending the nature the way it is. One example of the use of the anthropic principle is to "explain"
why the big bang occurred about ten thousand million years ago (the existence of human being occured about one or two or three
million years ago) -- it takes about that long for intelligent beings to evolves. An early generation of the stars first had
to form. These stars converted some of the original hydrogen and helium into elements like carbon and oxygen, out of which
we are made. The stars then exploded as supernovas, and their debris went to form other stars and planets, among them those
of our solar system, which is about five thousand million years old. The first one or two thousand million years of the earth's
existence were too hot for the development of anything complicated. The remaining three thousand million years or so have
been taken up by the slow process of biological evolution, which has led from the simplest organisms to beings who are capable
of measuring time back to the big bang. 17)
The laws of science as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electric
charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron. We cannot, at the moment at least, predict
the values of these numbers from theory - we have to find them by observation. It maybe that one day we shall discover a complete
unified theory that predicts them all. The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seems to have been very finely
arranged to make possible the development of life. 18)
(These standard measure / format / norm are found in social science - HDA = science that deal with man, such as the ideal
life span of the ideal Man is 120 years, ideal standard quality of human is 0,5 and their energy attained = 3x1018
joules , ...... etc)
1.3.4 INFLATION
In the late 1970s, a new concept of inflation was introduced which proposed that the universe expanded from
an initial state smaller than a proton to a macroscopic size about ten meters across in only a fraction of a second. The rate
of explanation was enormous. The idea could explained why is the Universe so flat like a tapestry ? Because that the mass
density of the Universe is perfectly tuned to the critical value from its earliest expansion. Just remember the third throw
of the tennis ball by an expert mathematician with infinite strength ... the ball is floating in the sky. But a rapid expansion
at the beginning would flatten out the Universe to the critical mass density as a "dried meat", not round like a ball.
Inflation can also explain why the background radiation is so uniform. When the Universe was of infinitesimal
size, all matter and energy was homogeneous, since everything was connected to everything else. As inflation took place, the
homogeneity that existed at the early instant was spread across the much larger Universe, which continued to expand. Thus,
when matter and radiation de-coupled about 300,000 years later, the Universe was still amazingly uniform. 19)
1.3.5 QUANTUM FLUCTUATION
Where did the universe come from? The number of galaxy is 100 billions, with meteors & particles ; the
number of matters in the universe are something like one with eighty zeroes after it = 1080 particles in the region
of the universe that we can observe. Where did they all come from? The answer is that, in quantum theory, particles can be
created out of energy in the form of particle/antiparticle pairs. But that just raises the question of where the energy came
from. The answer is that the total energy of the universe is exactly zero. The matter in the universe is made out of positive
energy. However, the matter is all attracting itself by gravity. Two pieces of matter that are close to each other have less
energy than the same two pieces a long way apart, because you have to expend energy to separate them against the gravitational
force that is pulling them together. Thus, in a sense, the gravitational field has negative energy. In the case of a universe
that is approximately uniform in space, one can show that this negative gravitational energy exactly cancels the positive
energy represented by the matter.
So the total energy of the universe is zero. The universe can double the amount of positive matter energy
and also double the negative gravitational energy without violation of the conservation of energy. This does not happen in
the normal expansion of the universe in which the matter energy density goes down as the universe gets bigger. It does happen,
however, in the inflationary expansion because the energy density of the super cooled state remain constant while the universe
expands: when the universe doubles in size, the positive matter energy and the negative gravitational energy both double,
so the total energy remains zero. During the inflationary phase, the universe increases its size by a very large amount. Thus
the total amount of energy available to make particles becomes very large. 20)
In short, the matters are from energy ......... matter energy is borrowed from the gravitational field energy.
The vacuum showing quantum fluctuations. Positive energy is borrowed from the inflating gravitational field to create Universe
matter. In only a fraction of a second inflation of the Universe took place. From an initial state smaller than a proton to
a macroscopic size about ten metres across. It expands by inflation first, then goes over to the standard hot big bang model.
21)
The willingness of God = no boundary proposal, which predicts density variations in the early Universe due
to quantum fluctuations of the vacuum; could be proved by Cobe II used a sensitive differential microwave radiometer (DMR)
measuring the difference in temperature between two points; it gives the answer : "The temperature difference between point
A and point B is 0.002 degrees".
This was George Smoot's project - In April 1992, made a dramatic announcement: "It now seemed possible for
theorist to explain some of the structure seen in today's Universe in terms of events which took place billion of years ago".
In another words one could take a photograph of the baby of the Universe at the
ages of 300 000 years or the other years which all showing the uniform Universe
- uniform in matter, the stars are scattered, distributed equally, uniformly. 22) (pps. 167, 168, 169)
4. RESUME
1.4.1 UPGRADING OF HAWKING PARADOX
The explanations of the paradox of Hawking: In terms he had in minds, that one tends to think classically
- there is no paradox, there is just only a single of the right one ; Those paradoxical facts would become natural for our
grandchildren; He suggests that the so called imaginary time (imaginary world) is really the real time. And that what we call
real time (real world) is just a figment of our imagination. So maybe what we call imaginary time is really more basic; Hawking
also stated that duality of Schr dinger's wave-particle is merely only wave. That is why the second approach, quantum cosmology
of the beginning of the universe that he explained perfectly was neglected; He forgot the mathematical model of Schr dinger
having two boundary conditions; 23) (pp. 172, 139, 172)
1. REALITY General Relativity Real World = to have a beginning.
2. REALITY No Boundary Proposal Imaginary World = begin -less universe!
Its illustrations, with the first boundary condition - Einstein Formulae - resulted in the universe (the
real world) with 20 billions of life span, a picture of the first triangle of Fig. 3. Could be as in Fig. 4, illustrating
the universe as a "tapestry" or "dried meat" floating in the vacuum/ REALITY .
Say that, REALITY = Nothingness is the source of the energy or of the matter of the universe, really preparing
infinity energy. One could say that REALITY that build the universe with 2 boundary conditions. According to the second boundary
condition " universe without boundaries either its space or its time" result in the oscillating universe that refused by Hawking
also scientist Wienberg due to its entropy is infinity.
Oscillation of T = 20 billion years, ù = 10-17 would analog Penzias & Wilson captured background
radiation of the big bang, so the harmonics of the oscillating universe could be captured ù = 10-9 that is the
oscillation of the big problems that come into existence every 200 years. (1900 Einstein - 1700 Newton - 1500 Descartez -
1300 Reinascance ...)
We have understood that REALITY supply infinite energy/ matter and free; Let's try the oscillation replaced
by the pictures of the first triangle finished, then replaced by the second triangle ...... and so on ...... but rotating
until the last triangle stay at the left of the first triangle. But the more reliable illustration picture is as Fig. 4, there
are tapestry rotating and floating in REALITY ... because of becoming a closed rotation it mean a finite thing or a finite
energy of it. Please look, imagine carefully is there any boundary for the space-time? .... there is not.
Newton Principia assumed that the space is absolute, but Einstein Special Relativity Theory stated that there
is no absolute thing, everything is relative to each others, classics; It means that everything is compared relative to the
others in the universe, say "tapestry" in order our observation or exploration to become wholeness. Which the tapestry is
floating in the vacuum/ REALITY which is capable of supplying energy/ matter any amount whatsoever, infinity, absolute, and
there is non comparable to it.
Probably in quantum level, one found "THE ABSOLUTE" "As long as something refers to REALITY they are absolute
right; As long as rationalities consistent with the facts they are relative right. ............. This is the end of natural
science, it has matched to its wholeness, it has saturated. (As long as Hawking/ we explaining that the real world & the
world hereafter are design & build by GOD/ REALITY these are absolute right; as long as Hawking explaining that "no boundary
proposal" seems consistent with the observation of our universe these are the relative right.
1.4.2 THE GIANT PROGRESS OF HAWKING
1. From the Resume no1 above, concealed that Hawking explaining, in context with ordinary peoples, in fact
that God design and build the real world and the world hereafter - the imaginary world (only mere imaginary, in imaginary
time). The idea of "imaginary time" & "No Boundary Conditions" (= the mind of God the will or the conditions of God) -
Those are the Giant Progress of Hawking! One find terribly explanations before, scientist found paradox probability, funny
things .... Turtle, superstring theory.
2. The law of science, nature contains many fundamental numbers (=standard measure as ISO). These standard
numbers have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life. 24) (pp. 125)
3. TOE must be proposed immediately!
1.4.3 THE NEXT STEPS
# The scientific answer to Aristotle's question - "Where is the Mind?
# Bringing forward TOE
# Application of TOE
That is why our message is splited into 4 chapters:
1. How is the universe constructed?
2. Where is the Mind?
3. What is TOE?
4. West - East live peacefully
Taufik Rusdi, 20 August 2001
NOTE:
1). Sir John Maddox, "Start of a New Frontier or ......", Time , (January 1998), Vol: ....: pp 98-99
......." The idea that the research community could have come to terms with all these revolutions of understanding
within the short space of a century flies in the face of the historical record. More often than not, deeper understanding
is like unpacking a nest of Russian dolls to find one image concealed within another. It is no wonder that we are still asking
the questions first posed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle 2500 years ago: How is the universe constructed? Where is the
mind? Much of progress in science consists in asking old questions in new, more penetrating and more perspective ways". .....
2). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time , Transworld Publisher Ltd. , London, 1992 , pp. ix -
x.
Carl Sagan : "We go about our daily lives understanding almost nothing of the world. We give little thought
to ....sunlight ... ....gravity ... atoms .... . Except for children wondering .... anthropic .... cosmos .... or whether
there are ultimate limits to what human can know ..... .
In our society it is still customary for parents and teachers to answer most of these questions with a shrug,
or with an appeal to vaguely recalled religious precepts. Some are uncomfortable with issues like these, because they so vividly
expose the limitations of human understanding. ...
These writing of Carl Sagan was at the year of 1987. And these NOTE was written at 17 August 2002, or, after
this book is finished; It means that they represent a wholeness approach or TOE approach.
We give little thought of the world except for children; Because of either prof. Hawking or prof. Sagan are still confusing.
Also either Einstein, or Newton, Galileo ... ending in ambiguity solved paradox. Paradoxical facts are taboo for SCIENTIST.
The Russell Paradox could be stated :
If p is right then p is wrong, or
If p is false then p is right.
Featuring Hawking's paradox; That the universe has a beginning, but the universe is begin -less begin - endless
end is right too. First is verified by Cobe I, the other verified by Cobe II.
It is better going back to the question: Whether there are ultimate limits to what human can know?
We have known as said by Hawking that the expanding universe is synchronic with the expansion/ development
of the knowledge of human being (in the same arrow of time). At this time the year of 2002, the universe has expanded in 10
billions years attaining half time of its life span more or less; And the universe has come to the steady state condition;
Say that a steady state = 90 % of expansion, it means that our knowledge has come to the steady state condition = "Ending
Process" mean that our knowledge would increasing 3-5 % until the end of the days - 10 billions years again. Hawking does
not agree with it for social sciences are stagnant, no mathematical model for prediction of human behavior. After TOE is introduced,
our knowledge has attained a steady state that's why the "Russell Paradox" could be well explained now. We need not waiting
our grand children who could explain it ..... featuring that those paradox are anthropic, the facts found in the universe
.... similarly, at one instant a light beam acts like a wave, and at the other time it acts like a particle. ... But remember
when no-one, no-mind, dealing with that light, it represent itself as nothingness - none comparable to it.
Sagan/ USA versus Hawking/ UK both are modern SCIENTIST, Cosmologist; And according to Hawking's paradox
that the total energy of the universe, or the Vacuum, is exactly zero. But during the inflationary phase, the universe increases
its size by a very large amount; Thus the total amount of energy available to make the universe become very large; The Vacuum/
quantum fluctuation could supply infinity of energy. Remember we have defined "the Vacuum" that fulfill the 4 conditions of
surah Al-Ikhlash = GOD. .... Then as stated below by Sagan, as SCIENTIST, stated that after God created the universe - nothing
for the Creator to do ...... So HE sat nothing else to do ..... 44 3 21 ....
This is also a book about God ..... or perhaps about the absence of God. ..... Hawking is attempting, as
he explicitly states, to understand the mind of God. And this makes all the more unexpected the conclusion of the effort,
at least so far, a universe with no edge in space, no beginning or end in time, and nothing for a Creator to do "
Explanation of the "Russell Paradox":
p = [ God at one instant His energy is zero E = 0 , but at another time His energy is infinity E = ]
If p is right then p is false , or, If p is false then p is right;
If p=[E=0] is right then p=[E= ] is false, or, If p=[E= ] is false then p = [E=0] is right ! ... Then by
anthropic approach, probably the Russell Paradox could be explained scientifically, isn't it?
For now, in TOE, if one could understand the mind / the willingness of God then their problems would solved!
The Vacuum, NO THING ness, is the absolute reference the chair to sit/ stand for all; NO THING ness is the
chair of the universe and the atom - the very large and the very small ! Look ff.!
RESUME : With the correct anthropic principle, probably we could upgrade (islakh, aufgehoben) those two top
SCIENTIST of USA & UK, and also the "Russell Paradox". Those anthropic are paradox depend on one by one of the preference
of the mind; Simply, in other words " Succession, talk one by one! If not, would become paradox and disputable! "
3). Ibid. pp. 168-167.
..... Seventy years ago, if Eddington is to be believed, only two peoples understood the general theory of
relativity. ... If a complete unified theory was discovered, ...... We would then be able to have some understanding of the
laws that govern the universe and are responsible for our existence.
Even if we do discover a complete unified theory, it would not mean that we would be able to predict events
in general, for two reason. The first is the limitation that the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics sets on our powers
of prediction. ... In practice, however, this first limitation is less restrictive than the second one. It arises from the
fact that we could not solve the equations of the theory exactly, except in a very simple situations. We already know the
laws that govern the behavior of matter under all but the most extreme conditions. In particular, we know the basic
laws that underlie all of chemistry and biology. Yet we have certainly not reduced these subjects to the status of solved
problems; we have, as yet, had little success in predicting human behavior from mathematical equations! So even if we do find
a complete set of basic laws, there will still be in the years ahead the intellectually challenging task of developing better
approximation methods, so that we can make useful predictions of the probable outcomes in complicated and realistic situations.
A complete, consistent, unified theory is only the first step; our goal is a complete understanding of the events around
us, and of our own existance.
Because of that we have found the HDA, that Hawking never heard of it, then in reality in TOE, we would then
all be able to have understanding, not only, the laws that govern the universe, chemistry & biology, but also, the laws
that govern humanity and Religion; And not only we have to develop the better approximation methods, but challenging us task
of collecting the standard measure/ mizan of nature and social that in TOE they really emerging theoretically, showing themselves.
According to Hawking inspiration above, that our goal is , first, a complete understanding of the events
around us , or, these time. According to Aristotle, Toynbee, Qur`an, Ronggowarsito that now, really a critically stressed
occurred, WTC crashed into the abyss .... every body mad but none ... due to the crises of perception probably. Second, a
complete understanding of our own existence that human being created through evolution of two billions years ago from sand
or mud becoming one cell being ... biology .....homo erectus transform into homo sapiens more or less 2 million years ago.
And now at the "Ending Process" human kind would transform into "ideal man" .... welfare for all ... rakhmatan lil `alamiin
..... world peace.
We have the task to succeed those difficult enterprise; If we do not succeed , man will destroy himself by
his halfway cleverness.
4). J.P. Mc Evoy and Oscar Zarate, Stephen Hawking for Beginners, Icon Book Ltd., Cambridge, 1995, pp. 38-46.
The Field Equation - What do they mean ?The 36-year old professor had produced a set of mathematical equations which gave
the details of the relationship between the curvature of space and the distribution of mass in the Universe. Einstein found
that matter tells space how to curve and then space tells matter how to move - a new way to describe gravitation. No forces.
A mind flip is necessary to jump between the two pictures of gravitation.
Contained within these miraculous equation is the explanation of the perihelion shift of mercury, the degree
of bending of starlight, the existence of gravitational waves, information on the singularities of space time, the description
of the information of neutron stars and black holes, even the prediction of the expansion of the Universe. That's the good
news.
The bad news is that the mathematics is extremely difficult. There are some 20 simultaneous equations with
10 unknown quantities. The equations are almost impossible to solve except in situation where symmetry of energy considerations
reduce them to simpler forms.
If we ignore the cosmological constant lambda (which doesn't belong there anyway) and consider free space
where the mass tensor is zero, the equations can be written very simply ....
Rik = 0 this is called the vacuum solution.
Visual -ising Curved Space: The Rubber Sheet Model
Einstein's gravitation is quite unusual, compared to other field theories like electricity or Magnetism,
in that the description of motion (i.e. how an object moves) is already built into the field equations (how space time is
curved). This can be understood with the help of a simple model - call it the rubber sheet picture.
Consider a billiard table with the slate top and felt cover replaced by a tault thin rubber sheet which is
highly stretchable. If a light object (e.g. a ping pong ball) is rolled across the sheet, it will move more or less in a straight
line. This simulates flat space and the ping pong ball's path corresponds to the straight line motion of special relativity.
Now place a heavy billiard ball in the center of the sheet, causing it to become curved with a depression
at the center. The model now simulates the curvature of space near a central mass as described by general relativity.
The simplest case (other than a straight line) is when the depression just captures the moving object to
produce a circular orbit. Note this occurs without the need of any centripetal force to keep the object in orbit, as in Newton's
picture.
The object would like to move in a straight line, but the space is curved, so it moves in a circle around
the center. It is simply moving along a path of least resistance in the curved space. This is the General Relativity's representation
of how a planet is captured in an orbit around he sun.
If the object is moving on a line directly towards the center, it falls right into the depression and accelerates
into the attracting center. This is a representation of a meteorite crashing into the sun or the earth.
With such diagrams it is now possible to visualize the distinct and utter difference between Newton and Einstein.
Einstein has replaced Newton's gravitational force with curved space.
The Schwarzschild GeometryIn 1915 the same year as Einstein's publication, the German mathematician Karl Schwarzschild
sent a paper to Einstein. Schwarzschild used elegant mathematical analysis to produce an exact solution to the equations for
an arbitrary spherical body, like a star. The solution intrigued Einstein greatly because he himself had only been able to
arrive at an approximate solution to his own equations and thought that an exact solution of the equations would never be
found. Look at Figure 1.
5). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Trans World Publishers Ltd. , London, 1992, pp. 45.
...... Finally, in the third kind of Friedmann model, with just the critical rate of expansion, space is
flat (and therefore is also infinite).
But which Friedmann model describe our universe? Will the universe eventually stop expanding and start contracting,
or will it expand forever? To answer this question we need to know the present rate of expansion, the gravitational attraction
will be too weak to halt the expansion. If the density is greater than the critical value, gravity will stop the expansion
at some time in the future and cause the universe to re-collapse.
6). Ibid. , p. 127
..... The initial rate of expansion also would have had to be chosen very precisely for the rate of expansion
still to be so close to the critical rate needed to avoid re-collapse. This means that the initial state of the universe must
have been very carefully chosen indeed if the hot big bang model was correct right back to the beginning of time. It would
be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God who intended
to create beings like us.
7). Ibid. , p. 46.
However, we cannot exclude the possibility that there might be some other form of matter, distributed almost
uniformly through out the universe, that we have not yet detected and that might still raise the average density of the universe
up to the critical value needed to halt the expansion. The present evidence therefore suggests that the universe will probably
expand forever, but all we can really be sure of is that even if the universe is going to re collapse, it won't do so far
at least another ten thousand millions years, since it has already been expanding for at least that long.
8). Stephen Hawking, A Brief Study of Time, op. cit. , p. 166
....... the old paradox: Can God make a stone so heavy that he can't lift it? But the idea that God might
want to change his mind is an example of the fallacy, pointed out by St. Augustine, of imaging God as a being existing in
time: time is a property only of the universe that God created. Presumably, he knew what he intended when he set it up!
9). J.P. McEvoy , Sthephen Hawking for Beginners , op. cit. , p. 136 ... The Uncertainty principle
& Virtual Particles : ...
10). Ibid. , p. 158
Waves & Particles: Nature's Joke on Physicist
Experiments have shown that a wave/ particle duality exists in nature. For example, a light beam produces
interference effects (acts like a wave) but also kicks electrons out of the the surface of a metal (acts like a particle).
Similarly, electrons exhibit all sorts of particle properties, yet a beam of electrons produces a diffraction pattern (waves)
when sent through a fine comblike grating. This duality is a basic fact of the physical world (=anthropic) and we must live
with it. It is a consequence of the well-known uncertainty principle .... or vice-versa.
11). Ibid. p. 158
.... " If the forces and barriers encountered by each particle are known in the classical sense for a particular
system, my equation can immediately be written down. The solution then gives in formation about the system at all points in
space and at all times. Wunderbar, ya!" - Schrodinger.
12). Ibid. , 168
Cobe: The greatest Discovery of all Time (?) Cobe took twelve years to design and carry out, but the results were nothing
short of spectacular. Launched in 1989, the instrument took only 8 minute to verify the conclusions based on the 1964 measurements
of Penzias and Wilson, but this time at many different wavelengths. The data traced out a near perfect thermal radiation curve
for a background temperature of 2.725 degrees C above absolute zero.
This Cobe I which used an absolute microwave radiometer calibrated by a bath of liquid helium on board the
satellite. The results proved without a doubt that the detectors were looking at the remnant of the hot, dense state of the
early Universe which we call the big bang. Such a curve would have thrilled Max Planck, as did the American Astronomical Society
when first presented in 1990.
But the big news was still to come Cobe II used a sensitive differential microwave radiometer (DMR) which
doesn't measure the absolute temperature of the radiation at a given point in the sky; rather, it measures the different in
temperature between two points. The Cobe I single antenna gives the answer: " The temperature at point A is 2.725 degree".
But the Cobe II dual antenna differential radiometer gives the answer: "The temperature difference between point A and point
B is 0.002 degree."
13). Ibid. , 156
...... the No Boundary Proposal which removes the singularity at the beginning of the Universe.
... Cosmology can not predict anything about the Universe without an assumption about the initial condition; All one can say
is that things are as they are now because they were as they were at an early stage. .... Many people feel that the initial
conditions for the Universe that determine how the Universe began is a question for metaphysics or religion rather than science.
14). Ibid. , 153
Why do we need Quantum theory?In the big bang model of the Universe, the general theory of relativity provide a reliable
program for describing the evolution of our Universe from just moments after time = 0 to the present day. However , thanks
to Hawking, we now know that, at the starting point, general relativity predicts a singularity and the theory breaks down.
It is a classical theory and time and space cannot be described by Einstein's equations when matter is crunched together at
such un belief able densities. How can physics predict the beginning of the universe if all the laws break down at the
big bang? Quantum theory must be used!
15). Ibid. , 162
17 January 1995 .... Real time ends at that point, but the Universe continues to be. ... = Universe in
the imaginary time
16). Ibid. , 161
J.P. McEvoy : " By choosing only universes with no boundaries - either in space or time - H & H obtain
results which seem consistent with observations on our Universe."
Closed Universe satisfy this restriction. They are finite but have no edges, something like the two-dimensional
surface of the earth. They expand, come to a halt, then fall back to the same state like the points on the rim of the bowl.
Depicted in this way, closed universe would have a beginning and an end, and would therefore have boundaries only in real
time. The imaginary component, however, is continuous. So H & H make the initial and final singularities of the closed
universe disappear.
They also demonstrate that uniform universe are the most probable and end up predicting that our Universe
is both closed and uniform - a finite sphere of space - time with no edges.
From Nasa infrared Satellite photographing uniform distribution of galaxies.
17). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Ibid. , p. 124
... One example of the use of the anthropic principle ....
18). Ibid. , p. 125
.... The laws of science .... fundamental numbers (mizan - standard measure) ...... These standard measure
seem to have been very finely ajusted to make possible the development of life. .... One can take this either as evidence
of Devine purpose in Creation and the choice of the laws of science or as support for the strong anthropic principle.
19).J.P. McEvoy , Stephen Hawking For Beginners, Ibid. , p. 163
InflationIn the late 1970s, a new concept of inflation was introduced which proposed that the Universe expanded from an
initial state smaller than a proton to a macroscopic size about ten meters across in only a fraction of a second. The rate
of expansion was enormous. The idea solved two problems which had been nagging cosmologists for years.
1. Why is the Universe so flat, i.e. shows no evidence of curvature?
2. Why is the cosmic background radiation so uniform?
20). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Ibid. , p. 129
Where those material of stars, galaxy are coming from?
E = mc2 , particle can be created out of energy in the form of particle - anti particle pairs
= fluctuation quantum of energy. The energy of the vacuum is zero. The same, the energy of the universe = 0. Due to that the
vacuum contain infinity of fluctuation quantum that's why could be taken the infinity of energy from the vacuum; We can say
that the energy of the Vacuum is infinity. Then probably we could understand those
the "Russell Paradox". Look at 3) !
21). J.P. McEvoy, Stephen Hawking For Beginners, Ibid. , p. 163
Inflation was the expanded Universe from an initial state smaller than a proton to a size about ten meters
across in only a fraction of a second.
22). Ibid. , pp. 167 - 168 - 169.
.... However both the big bang singularity and quantum fluctuation could be proved if very accurate absolute
and extremely sensitive differential measurements were made of the cosmic background radiation. This was George Smoot's project
- to look for evidence of ripples in space time of the 300 000 years old Universe. In April 1992, after more than two years
of data collecting and analysis, Smoot and his team made a dramatic announcement. THe Cobe satelite had detected tiny temperature
variations of the order of about one-hundred-thousandth of a degree in the background radiation.
According to computer generated plots of the entire sky, the temperature was minutely higher in the direction
of the large galactic clusters and slightly lower in the great cosmic voids.
Resume : The facts happened a million, billions years ago could be photographed from just right now.
23). Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Ibid. , pp. 172 - 139 - 172.
Hawking : " Quantum mechanics deals with this situation via a class of quantum theories in which particles
don't have well-defined positions and velocities but are represented by a wave. The quantum theories are deterministic in
the sense that they give laws for the evolution of the wave with time. Thus if one knows the wave at one time, one can calculate
it at any other time. The unpredictable, random element comes in only when we try to interpret the waves in terms of the positions
and velocities of particles. But maybe that is our mistake; maybe they are no particle positions and velocities, but only
waves. It is just that we try to fit the waves to our preconceived ideas of positions and velocities. The resulting mis match
is the cause of the apparent unpredictability."
.... " This may suggest that the so called imaginary time is really the real time, and that what we call
real time is just a figment of our imagination. In real time, the universe has a beginning and an end at singularities or
boundaries. So maybe what we call imaginary time is really more basic, and what we call real is just an idea that we invent
to help us describe what we think the universe is like. But according to the approach that a scientific theory is just a mathematical
model we make to describe our observations; it exists only in our minds. So it is meaningless to ask: Which is real, "real"
or "imaginary" time? It is simply a matter of which is the more usual description."
The Facts depend on the Mind
# Just the formulae or Mathematical Model of Schrodinger is something that none comparable to it; If our
mind involve in it, the boundary condition -1 would produce Fact-1 , material world; If involving the boundary -2 would produce
Fact-2 , the wave.
# The same thing to the construction of the universe: The Boundary condition -1 = MM of Einstein's General
Relativity ;
The Boundary Condition -2 = Quantum Cosmology - No Boundary Proposal (The Willingness of GOD) Producing the
Universe and the Here After = imaginary world = "akherat"
24). Hawking, A Brief History of Time, op. cit. , p. 125 = 18)
[ ]
1 2 3
HUBBLE TELESCOPE HIGH UP IN THE SKY
Edwin Hubble, at Mount Wilson Planetarium found that the galaxies in the sky are more & more apart from
each other due to, the universe are spreading out always - a great discovery in the xx -th century. With his general relativity
proved by Hubble , Einstein going up to this scientist astronomical mountain .... in order to look on the history of the universe
Lyman Spitzer 1946 proposing an idea of outer space telescope , Hubble telescope is twenty of years working
hard of scientist & engineer ; working hard reward of one generation.
Hubble primary optical mirror is miss placed of 1/50 of one hair. The small error is enough to ruin the two
billion dollars telescope. These fault because of man make mistake in using the difference metric standard measure , say,
the primary mirror using Sevres standard measure , while the secondary mirror referring to atomized standard measure.
The austronouts fix them in space during two weeks ! 2 December 1993 . And now the stage was ready for the
biggest mission in history ; The drama has to be opened & showed !
Hubble ‘s telescope using 2 mirrors , look at the track of the light at the figure , the second mirror
guiding the light into "instrument bay" , through the hole in the middle of the main mirror. Its potency could detect the
candle light at Tokyo from LA - Los Angeles.
This Hubble telescope sending photo digital to communication satellite ; Tracking objects in the sky with
high accurate , by looking at the screen monitor , it is not like at the time of Hubble, long ago by peeping the telescope..
1 2 3
THE GALAXY - THE UNIVERSE ARE LIKE "FRIED EGG" FLOATING IN THE VACUUM
Einstein theory , that matter tells the space how to bent and then the space tells the matter how to moves
; the space which near the matter having large mass would be bent like a horn.
At the years of 1970, emerging a paradigm that assume that universe spread out at the beginning , t= 0+ ,
as large as a proton enlarge into 10 meter in diameters in a short time a , fraction of a second .
These idea solving the difficult problem in cosmology , during the years; first, why the universe is flat
no curvature at all, second, why the radiation cosmic background is so uniform? With these paradigm - really we human being
get into the description / world of Ilahiyah / GOD ; Due to that Hawking have explaining that the "VACUUM" is the source of
the matter, gravitation, natural laws, the energy .... and the others - alias - that creating the universe is the Vacuum that
is wajib wujut Allah. .. The CREATOR and the Universe is HIS creation.
EXPANDING UNIVERSE -VS- GENERAL RELATIVITY
Tele -Hubble opening a new window ; and find the answer of the question that we never think would be questioned
. Such as Einstein questioned , is the universe static or dynamics ? That is guessed as static , but it is not right due to
Hubble ‘s response .... Galaxies are more and more far apart , spread out, and the universe spreading out . And Einstein
realize that the Lambda constat is a big mistake, universe is not static.
Look at fig.1 and fig. 2 ,general relativity plotting the space is bent like a horn and the galaxy is like
a fried egg , look at the others Hubble’s photographs ; And because of "inflation" effect the universe having the same
flat object like fried meat/ egg and say , stay at the top of the horn with infinite space.
Photo of Edwin Hubble beside in the far right ; Einstein beside in the far left , going to Mount Wilson to
look / peep the history of the universe. Now Hubble telescope having capability to look/ photo the whole universe at the year
of 5 billion years ago ; you see all of these are galaxies not a star ; If one could photographed at t=0+ ; 10 billions ago
those are "inflation" processes; which in the Holy Kitab/ Qur`an stated that at t= 0+ , MY first creation , human being
could not witness it !
Scientist at the Institute of Outer Space Telescope astonish , why the result calculation is paradox
. ... Her son is older than his mother ? ... These must got into tunnel ..... "Warm Hole" ? Probably according the writer
, that at the marginal / "inflation", one have to believe / iman - merely, Hawking said that, it is only GOD that knows ,
can calculated determinant , human being could not
" Allah knows, and you are not " (Qur`an)
THE BIRTH OF THE STARS
Orion Nebulae galaxy , having mother like side ! The place of the birth of the stars . There is "Halo" material,
the mixture of gas and dust powdery , around it; These cluster is the beginning of earth planet that begin being constructed
, probably another earth planet is on going to be built .
At Eagle Nebulae found also hatching places of star, young stars incubated. Every star embryo is surrounded
by the mixture of gas and dust powdery , around it ; These eggs supply food to that growing stars. If the weight is enough
, excited a reaction for its birth , but not all of the eggs are hatched. On part of the top of Eagle is found the dense of
gas & that is a star.
At the time in looking of making stars process , building element process and leasing again to outer space
; It is the same in looking the extreme rute of us.; Star is born ... and at the end of the life is dead ! The stars have
life period as humanity .
Tadpole; Dying star eventually leaves a strange stamp ... bundle of blows and becoming tedpoles in the galagtic
pool ... that would become the birth of the chaotic planets !
THE DEATH OF THE STARS
The star have life cycle, and who , anything live certainly would dye !
The dead of a star, its prognosis, at that time happened at its outer skin - cast of skin peeled and become
such as a matter; Star could become a Neuton star, but this star first blown called Supernova .... making higher its light
one billions time.
The dying star eventually leave a strange stamps .... tedpole that become planet without certainty track
and going a stray
But a biggest star having a strange destiny ; Transform into a black hole. Hubble photograph a possible first
time of these phenomena . The black hole constructed at the time of the dead of a big star collapsed - crunched ! The core
forces are not sufficient to support its structure. With a very big pull forces then creating withdraw effect, absorption
all of thing into. The inner object crashed into smaller thing . But having larger mass . But its mass is absolute. Nothing
could escape from the black hole, even light ! The black hole peeps at the heart of the some certain galaxy. We have a program
to investigate the center of electrical galaxy ..... founding beauty powdery .... we look directly classical pictures of the
black hole at the center of galaxy. Ford, found the core of the galaxy that spinning with high velocity ; These galaxy have
to smashed , due to, the center spin very quick ; There something holding, anchoring it ; Hubble photgraphs all of it too;
1. First spinning ,
2. More velocity .
3. The quickest one then
4. Blowing out ring of fire , and scientist thinking of it that this ring of fire emerging from the inner
center of the black hole. A splash as long as 40 000 million years light;
5. The black hole that sucking all of thing , even light .
6. Absorption totally and the black hole without light can not be catch ed by Hubble; the camera catches
the very black
Hubble are not only looking back at the birth of the galaxy ; But also the biggest birth of the universe
; It conduct by serving a data the distance from earth to another galaxy . And the velocity of the galaxy in spreading out.
Edwin Hubble treat this formulae to find when the big bang occurred ..... But why the astronomer wanted to know it? The Doctor
necessary to know the old of the patient in order the diagnose is not wrong; It is the same astronomer necessary to know the
age of the universe; Astronomer have believed the ages of the universe is 15 billion of years; Hubble showing a strange data
; The universe is younger than its supposition of 8 - 12 billion years . Younger than these old stars . The number are not
fix . This could be said as a paradox; How could her daughter is older than the mother ? These are big problem in cosmology
. We do not understand the response of the big bang. It not means that the big bang is wrong - but we not yet ready comprehend
it totally. Or we do not understand at the more basics.
What will be if we arrange to aim Hubble in the very deep point ? .... I feel the number of the galaxies
I see are wonderfull . These are the far-est away photograph which ever photographed by telescope ! Scientist name it - Hubble
Deep Field. Every small point is a galaxy containing 100 billion of stars . There are 1500 galaxies in this photo.. Its game
is to find the way to reveal this photo; To find the far and the near. Because we are not only want to observe the galaxy
that ‘s far away. But because of seeing to the past .... making me mind of tunnel vision in the form that extreme totally.
COLOR BEAUTY OF NATURE, ATTRACTIVE AND TOUCH TO EVERY ONE
1. Beautiful photograph of sky and cloud .... It looks like having a hole - isn’t it ? A very rare
probability.
2. Photo of Europe at the sunset from the outer space.
3. Color beauty at the island of Eisland, with a background of 4 big - beatiful stars , with statue’s
eyes that really live of those two.
4. Caldera at Mars , as boy’s toys of clay, when ... when we were young someday.
5. Galaxy of cloud having a hole
6. Galaxy of head of horse
7. Totally eclipse that very attractive ... included a tree in it and very beautiful indeed.
8. Galaxy of " Ikeya" .... it is like turtle , throwing from his mouth a white shining coming from his throat.
|